М. В. Ломоносова, М. Б. Буланова, “В.М. БЕХТЕРЕВ И П.А. СОРОКИН: НАУЧНЫЙ СОЮЗ ВО ИМЯ СОЦИОЛОГИИ” (M. V. Lomonosova and M.B. Bulanova, “V.M. Bekhterev i P.A. Sorokin: Nauchnyy Soyuz vo Imya Sotsiologii’ [V. M. Bekhterev and P. A. Sorokin: Scientific Union in the Name of Sociology]”

 

 

Lomonosova and Bulanova, ‘Bekhterev and Sororkin’

Lomonosova and Bulanova, ‘Bekhterev and Sorokin’ RUSSSIAN

Lomonosova and Bulanova, ‘Bekhterev and Sorokin’ ENGLISH

 

posted here:

М. В. Ломоносова, М. Б. Буланова, “В.М. БЕХТЕРЕВ И П.А. СОРОКИН: НАУЧНЫЙ СОЮЗ ВО ИМЯ СОЦИОЛОГИИ” (M. V. Lomonosova and M.B. Bulanova, “V.M. Bekhterev i P.A. Sorokin: Nauchnyy Soyuz vo Imya Sotsiologii’ [V. M. Bekhterev and P. A. Sorokin: Scientific Union in the Name of Sociology]”

The Russian original is posted as both as a PDF and Word document.

The English translation (Word document above) is by Roger W. Smith.

 

posted by Roger W. Smith

     July 2024

“What benefit does Russia derive from this Institute?” Tsar Nicholas II on the Psycho-Neurological Institute

 

A most interesting article has been posted on line and brought to my attention by its author:

“What benefit does Russia derive from this Institute?” Tsar Nicholas II on the Psycho-Neurological Institute: The last Emperor of Russia and Vladimir Bekhterev’s Psycho-Neurological Institute revolutionaries

by Federico Soldani

29th Oct 2021

https://psypolitics.org/2021/10/29/what-benefit-does-russia-derive-from-this-institute-tsar-nicholas-ii-on-the-psycho-neurological-institute-2021/

 

Sorokin was a student at the Psycho-Neurological Institute.

As Soldani notes: “The Institute offered medical training of the highest order, but its students’ revolutionary tendencies were becoming a concern for the government. In 1912, the mayor of Saint Petersburg had reported on political activity among the capital’s students. In margin of the section on the Psycho-Neurological Institute, Tsar Nicholas II had written, “What benefit does Russia derive from this Institute? I wish to have a well-founded answer”. In the spring of 1914 the minister of public education presented an additional report on the anti-governmental attitudes of Bekhterev’s students and recommended the Institute’s closure.”