Pitirim A. Sorokin: Rediscovering a Master of Sociology

 

 

The following monograph has just been published:

Pitirim A. Sorokin: Rediscovering a Master of Sociology

by Emiliana Mangone

Vernon Press, 2023

More information is available at

https://vernonpress.com/book/1812

 

The following is a synopsis by Olga A. Simonova, Academic Supervisor of the School of Sociology at the National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia:

This book is a historical and sociological study of the ideas of the outstanding Russian American sociologist Pitirim Sorokin. In a relatively small book (which is its undoubted virtue), his ideas are presented in a clear manner, along with biographical facts. The book consists of three parts and eight chapters. At the beginning, we are introduced to a biographical lapidary sketch, which the author justifiably divides into two main parts – the Russian period and the American period, which is not a simplification but makes the perception of the development of the social thinker’s ideas clearer and more coherent. Then some works of the American period are disclosed, including very controversial ones, including the general theory of socio-cultural dynamics by Sorokin, which is one of the most important theories of cultural development in the twentieth century. In the third part, the author considers Sorokin’s ideas, first of all, those of altruistic love, in the context of global problems, conflicts, and catastrophes.

The book is valuable for the younger generation of sociologists, as it addresses the rediscovery of the ideas of the classic sociology, which have been undeservedly forgotten or ignored in research and publications. In this way, the book contributes to the continuity of sociological theory and sociological education. Today Sorokin’s ideas have become relevant and even topical again since Sorokin, as the author points out, was formed as a scholar in an era of social upheaval in Russia and became a prominent theorist of revolution and

humanitarian catastrophes and at the same time a scholar who passionately sought a way out of the crisis of modern civilization through a revival of altruism and brotherly love. Throughout the book Emiliana Mangone solves several sociological “puzzles”: why the Russian-born social thinker had such an impressive career, why he remained a “stranger” in American sociology, why he turned to “positive” social phenomena – solidarity, altruism, brotherly love, friendship, the revival of spiritual values – even though he witnessed dramatic social and political events.

The book is a truly fundamental study – it fully and clearly presents Sorokin’s theory and methodology in the form of an integral picture of culture and society and a mixed integral method of research, establishes the connection between Sorokin’s ideas and other sociological traditions, reveals interesting biographical facts (in particular, in a very interesting chapter on Sorokin and Talcott Parsons’s relations, which are considered not in terms of sympathy and antipathy but in terms of development of sociological knowledge and institutionalization of the discipline), and is based on the most important sources on Sorokin’s work.

The author of the folio observes all the norms of academic ethics and neutrality, so the book is genuinely interesting. Much about Sorokin’s work and his biography is already known, but the book is of interest to Russian researchers, too, who often miss the details of the American period of his career. The fundamental novelty of this book is the consideration of Sorokin’s work in the contemporary global context – global crises, epidemics, and war, which is obviously necessary for all and not only for sociologists.

National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, “Open Letter to the American People on American-Soviet Friendship”

 

Corliss Lamont, ‘Open Letter’ (2)

 

Posted here:

Open Letter to the American People on American-Soviet Friendship

Introduction by Corliss Lamont

New York: The National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, 1943

Sorokin was one of the signers. His Russia and the United States was published in 1944.

Corliss Lamont (1902-1995) was an American socialist and advocate of various left-wing and civil liberties causes. He was Chairman of The National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, which was founded in 1943.

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

      May 2023

Bolshevik Feminist

 

from Barbara Evans Clements, Bolshevik Feminist: The Life of Aleksandra Kollontai (Indiana University Press, 1979), pp. 117-118:

Kollontai’s political fortunes rose with those of the Bolsheviks. At the Sixth Party Congress in late July, while she sat in jail, she became the first woman elected to the Central Committee, polling the sixth highest vote. In nominating her a Bolshevik candidate to the Constituent Assembly, Stalin placed her fifth on the list, after Lenin, Zinoviev, Trotsky, and Lunacharskii. When she was released from prison, Proletarii, the party newspaper, welcomed her back by declaring: “Greetings to the fighter, returned to our ranks.” Requests came in to the Petrograd offices for her pamphlets, and colleagues acknowledged her as one of their best orators. Pitirim Sorokin, a Socialist Revolutionary who was later to become an eminent sociologist, wrote after losing a debate with her:

As for this woman, it is plain that her revolutionary enthusiasm is nothing but a gratification of her sexual satyriasis [sic]. In spite of her numerous “husbands,” Kollontai, first the wife of a general, later the mistress of a dozen men, is not yet satiated. She seeks new forms of sexual sadism. I wish she might come under the observation of Freud and other psychiatrists. She would indeed be a rare subject for them. [Pitirim A. Sorokin, Leaves From a Russian Diary (Boston: Beacon Press, 1950), p. 59]

Sorokin’s anger at Kollontai and the Bolsheviks’ admiration for her sprang from the same source—Kollontai’s talent as a speaker. She had never been more effective in presenting Bolshevik demands for “peace, bread, and land” and “all power to the soviets.” Bolshevik popularity was greater than ever before, and Kollontai, buoyed by sympathetic audiences and by her party’s success, rushed happily from meeting to meeting. Her speeches, she felt, “expressed the general striving, the united mass will,” of the crowds who shared her radicalism. The final push by the people toward freedom and community had begun. Both then and later, Kollontai hailed the spontaneity of the revolution. She attributed the party’s success to the fact that it simultaneously expressed the will of the people and led their historically determined march.

— posted by Roger W. Smith

     May 2023

 

Pitirim A. Sorokin, commentary — Erich Fromm, “War Within Man”

 

Sorokin commentary; Erich Fromm, ‘War Within Man’

 

Posted here (PDF above) is Sorokin’s commentary (pp. 42-43) in

Erich Fromm

War Within Man : A Psychological Enquiry into the Roots of Destructiveness: A Study And Commentary

Philadelphia: Peace Literature Service of the American Friends Service Committee, 1963

Erich Fromm (1900-1980) was a German social psychologist and
psychoanalyst. Fromm belonged to a Neo-Freudian school of psychoanalytical theory.

It is well known that Sorokin had little interest in or sympathy with psychoanalysis and Freudianism.

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

    April 2023

“Eternal Memory”

 

‘A Long Journey;’ pp 49-51

 

Posted here (above) are the third movement of Dmitri Shostakovich’s eleventh symphony; and an excerpt from A Long Journey: The Autobiography of Pitirim A. Sorokin.

 

The third movement, “Eternal Memory,” starts with a halting motion on pizzicato strings, over which a noble melody (“You Fell As Victims,” most famous of all the revolutionary songs and whose deployment was by no means limited to Soviet composers) is heard on violas then extended to upper strings. A somber new theme, heard initially on woodwind and brass before being transformed on violins, begins the ascent to the apex, at the summit of which the climactic motif from the previous movement is sounded out balefully on full orchestra, underpinned by pounding timpani that continue as the intensity subsides. The viola melody, now a distant recessional, is heard again before pizzicato strings arrive at a questioning pause.”

– program notes to a recording of Shostakovich’s Eleventh

 

Note that the beginning of the third movement is so faint that it is barely audible for a minute or two.

 

A footnote: My uncle Roger Handy gave me a Christmas gift of Shostakovich’s eleventh  symphony in a premier recording by André Cluytens that was released when I was in college, for which gift I was and remain deeply grateful.

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

     December 2022

 

Sorokin and Kondratieff

 

L to R; Nikolai Kondratieff and wife, Elena Sorokin, Pitirim Sorokin; Minnesota, 1927

Of … memorable reunions in Minneapolis, that with my closest old friend, Professor N. Kondratieff, must be mentioned. As a foremost agricultural economist and expert on business cycles, he was permitted by the Soviet Government to visit American universities and research institutions in his field. This task brought him to the University of Minnesota where he stayed with us for several days. It was a real joy for us to see him alive and well and to talk with him about our Russian friends, the economic and political conditions in Russia, and the basic problems of the world at large. Unfortunately this reunion was our last meeting. A few years after his return to Russia, he was accused by Stalin in 1931 of being the leading ideologist and planner of an anti-Communist reconstruction of Russian agriculture. As such, he was “purged,” and disappeared. We heard rumors that he had been banished and had perished somewhere in Turkestan or Mongolia. But exactly how and where he perished we have never learned up to the present time. Requiem eternam et lux perpetua to you, our dearest friend!

A Long Journey: The Autobiography of Pitirim A. Sorokin, pg. 233

 

*****************************************************

As the semester [at the University of Minnesota] got under way, they learned that their old friend Nikolai Kondratieff would be visiting in early November. Kondratieff was widely known in Russia as a theorist of economic cycles, a statistician, and an agricultural economist. Pitirim had not seen Kondratieff since staying with him in Moscow after being released by the Chekha. They had first met as boys at the Khrenovo Teachers’ Seminary when Pitirim was fourteen and Nikolai almost eleven. Kondratieff, like Sorokin, was expelled for revolutionary activities. When he learned that Pitirim was in night school at the Tscherniayevskye Kursy, he went to St. Petersburg, where the two were roommates for several years. They completed night school together and went on to the University of St. Petersburg. Nikolai had met Elena shortly after she became acquainted with Pitirim, and all had endured the trials of the revolution. Kondratieff had also served in the Kerensky government as the deputy minister for food.

Kondratieff’s visit lasted for nearly a month, and the Sorokins delighted in showing him the Twin Cities. Pitirim also introduced Nikolai to some of his colleagues in the department and to others in agricultural economics. As Kondratieff’s work had not yet been translated into English, American scholars were largely unaware of his ideas, although some knew of him as a Soviet economic planner and farm expert. Sorokin kept Kondratieff’s visit quiet because he feared that their association might create problems when his friend returned to Russia. Pitirim’s concern actually foreshadowed his friend’s ultimate fate. Five years later, Kondratieff’s economic ideas brought him into conflict with Soviet policies. He was jailed in 1930 and appeared in the mock trials of 1931-32 in which Stalin purged so-called enemies of the state. However, Pitirim did not sense that when Nikolai left for Washington in early December 1924 it would be the last time he would see his boyhood friend. Kondratieff..

Barry V. Johnston, Pitirim A. Sorokin: An Intellectual Biography, pp. 29-30

 

*****************************************************

Wikipedia:

Kondratiev was removed from the directorship of the Institute of Conjuncture in 1928 and arrested in July 1930, accused of being a member of a “Peasants Labour Party” (a non-existent party invented by the NKVD). Convicted as a “kulak-professor” and sentenced to 8 years in prison, Kondratiev served his sentence, from February 1932 onwards, at Suzdal, near Moscow. Although his health deteriorated under poor conditions, Kondratiev continued his research and decided to prepare five new books, as he mentioned in a letter to his wife. Some of these texts were indeed completed and were published.

His last letter was sent to his daughter, Elena Kondratieva, on 31 August 1938. In September 1938 during Stalin’s Great Purge, he was subjected to a second trial, condemned to ten years without the right to correspond with the outside world. However, Kondratiev was executed at the Kommunarka shooting ground by firing squad on the same day the sentence was issued. Kondratiev was 46 at the time of his execution.

 

— posted by Roger W.  Smith

     December 2022

Наука и жизнь

 

Наука и жизнь (Science and Life). a Russian émigré magazine, was published in New York from March 1923 to July 1924.

I have copied all the issues from a microfilm at the New York Public Library. See PDF attached here.

An article by Sorokin appeared in the December 1923 issue (see attached).

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

     November 1923

 

Nauka i Zhizn

Sorokin, December 1923

 

dedication page, The Reconstruction of Humanity

 

Pitirim A. Sorokin

The Reconstruction of Humanity

The Beacon Press, 1948

 

dedication, The Reconstruction of Humannty

 

posted by Roger W. Smith

October 2022

a meeting in Winchester

 

Walicki Zniewolony umysł po latach PL-ENG

 

Posted here (Word document above) are the original Polish and an English translation by Angelina Weimann of an except from the following book:

Andrzej Walicki

Zniewolony umysł po latach

Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Czytelnik. 1993

Rozdział: „Rosja” (fragment)

 

Andrzej Walicki
Captive Mind After Years
Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Czytelnik
Chapter: “Russia” (excerpt)

 

Andrzej Walicki (1930 2020) was a Polish historian and a professor at the University of Notre Dame. He specialized in philosophy of sociopolitics, history of Polish and Russian philosophy, Marxism, and liberal thought. He was one of the scholars who formed the “Warsaw school of the history of ideas.”

Angelina Weimann: “Walicki  made a detailed study of Russian philosophy. It was not always well received because Poland, due to historical facts (the Russian partitions, Stalin’s regime, the USSR), is not an ideal place for the study of great Russians. However, thanks to Russia, many Polish scholars, including Sorokin’s teacher, Leon Petrażycki, received an excellent education and would become international scholars.”

See Andrzej Walicki, The Slavophile Controversy : History of a Conservative Utopia in Nineteenth-Century Russian Thought (Notre Dame Press, 1989)

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

      October 2022

 

Acknowledgment: I wish to thank Angelina Weimann for sharing this excerpt in the original with me; and for offering to do an English translation.

Roger W. Smith, Несколько Слов о Проф. П. А. Сорокине (A Few Words About Prof. P. A. Sorokin)

 

Roger W. Smith – The New Review no 308 (2022)

Roger W. Smith, ‘A Few Words About Prof. P. A. Sorokin’ IN RUSSIAN

Roger W. Smith, ‘A Few Words About Prof. P. A. Sorokin’ – The New Review, No. 308

 

Posted here (PDF above) is my article “Несколько Слов о Проф. П. А. Сорокине” (A Few Words About Prof. P. A. Sorokin), which was published in the Russian language journal (it is published in New York) новый журнал / The New Review: No. 308 (2022). It was published in a Russian translation by the journal’s editor, Marina Adamovich.

Also, relevant correspondence between Sorokin and Tolstoy’s daughter Alexandra Tolstoy, which was also published with credit to me.

Russian and English texts are also posted here as Word documents.

 

— Roger W. Smith

      September 2022