Юрий Дойков, “Почему молчал Питирим Сорокин?; От Лубянки до Гарварда (1918-1930)” [Yuri Doykov. Why was he silent?; Pitirim Sorokin? From the Lubyanka to Harvard (1918-1930)]

 

Yuri Doykov, ‘Why Was He Silent’

Yuri Doykov, ‘Why Was He Silent’ RUSSIAN

Yuri Doykov, ‘Why Was He Silent’ ENGLISH

 

posted here:

Юрий Дойков, Почему молчал Питирим Сорокин?; От Лубянки до Гарварда (1918-1930) [Yuri Doykov, Why was he silent?; Pitirim Sorokin? From the Lubyanka to Harvard (1918-1930)]

The Russian original is posted as both as a PDF and Word document.

The English translation (Word document above) is by Roger W. Smith.

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

     July 2o24

Sorokin, Preface to “Social Mobility”

 

‘Social Mobility’ – Preface, etc

 

Posted here (PDF above):

Editor’s Introduction (by F. Stuart Chapin)

Sorokin’s Preface

Pitirim Sorokin, Social Mobility, New York: Harper & Brothers, 1927

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

     June 2024

КОРДУН, «СОЦИОЛОГИЯ РЕВОЛЮЦИИ» ПИТИРИМА СОРОКИНА (Kordun, “The Sociology of Revolution” of Pitirim Sorokin]

 

Kordun, ‘The Sociology of Revolution of Pitirim Sorokin’

Kordun, ‘The Sociology of Revolution of Pitirim Sorokin’ RUSSIAN

Kordun, ‘The Sociology of Revolution of Pitirim Sorokin’ ENGLSH

 

Posted here, in the original Russian and English translation:

В.А. КОРДУН, «СОЦИОЛОГИЯ РЕВОЛЮЦИИ» ПИТИРИМА СОРОКИНА: НАУЧНЫЙ ТРУД И АВТОР: СУДЬБА В ЭМИГРАЦИИ (V. A. Kordun, “The Sociology of Revolution” of Pitirim Sorokin: Scholarship and the Author: His Destiny as an Emigrant)

translation by Roger W. Smith and Natalia S. Sergieva

Herbert Hoover letter to Sorokin

 

Herbert Hoover to Sorokin 2-2-1926

 

Posted here as a Word document: a letter from Herbert Hoover, then Secretary of Commerce, to Sorokin, dated February 2, 1926.

— posted by Roger W Smith

     April 2024

 

 

a critical review of Sorokin’s “Sociological Theories of Today”

 

review of Sociological Theories of Today – Sociological Bulletin, March 1967

 

posted here (PDF above)

review of Sociological Theories of Today

By Pitirim A. Sorokin

reviewed by D. Narain

Sociological Bulletin

Volume 16, Number 1 (March 1967)

pp. 95-100

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

      April 2024

a critical review of Sorokin’s “Fads and Foibles”

 

Jean Floud review of ‘Fads and Foibles in Modern Sociology’

 

posted here (PDF above)

review of Fads and Foibles in Modern Sociology and Related Sciences

By Pitirim A. Sorokin

reviewed by Jean Floud

British Journal of Educational Studies

Volume VI, Number 1 (November 1957)

pp. 84-86

Jean Esther Floud (1915-2013) was a prominent sociologist. She was the Principal of Newnham College, Cambridge, from 1972 to 1983.

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

      April 2024

Sorokin’s letter to Lenin

 

dated December 4, 1918

English translation by Roger W. Smith and Natalia Sergieva

 

letter to Lenin RUSSIAN

letter to Lenin ENGLISH

 

See Word documents above.

 

– posted by Roger W. Smith

   March 2024

 

 

 

some favorite Sorokin photos

 

Most of these have already been posted by me elsewhere.

— Roger W. Smith

 

Sorokin 1917
Elena 1917
Sorokin and Elena with her family, Tambov
Kondratieff (left) and Sorokin with wives, Minnesota
Sorokin family, Winchester

Sorokin, summer home, Canada
Sorokin at writing desk, Winchester
Peter P. Sorokin
Dr. Sergei P. Sorokin
Sergei P. Sorokin

“He is to me like God,” wrote an awestruck Freshman.

 

Faculty Profile (Fadiman) – Harvard Crimson 4-22-1941

 

Posted here (Word document above) is the following article about Sorokin:

“Faculty Profile”

The Harvard Crimson

April 22, 1941

 

– posted by Roger W Smith

     March 2023

“A Sociologist’s Political Memories”

 

review of Leaves from a Russian Diary – Chicago Evening Post 1-30-1925

 

Posted here:

“A Sociologist’s Political Memories”

review of Sorokin, Leaves from a Russian Diary

reviewed by Lawrence Martin

The Chicago Evening Post Literary Review

January 30, 1925

 

*****************************************************

a “footnote”

I read Sorokin’s Leaves years ago, after “discovering” him. It was the second Sorokin book I read (after The Crisis of Our Age). It was unforgettable; it made a very strong impression of me.

This review conveys the excitement that the book conveyed. And it hints at some of its weaknesses, which I would say are those of a lot of good storytellers: a tendency at times to exaggeration and of, at times, “polishing the apple,” which is to say “prettying” incidents for effect.

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

     February 2024